Solutions to Merchant Cash Advance Problems
We have problems needing solutions. We have people investigating these merchant cash advance problems. They research. They investigate what other researchers have discovered. They perform original research examining new views and new merchant cash advance data. They make hypothesis, perform experiments, and test the new information. New merchant cash advance processes and technology move from the laboratory and into practice; however, the new processes do not receive acceptance and enthusiastic implementation. Our naive model is we learn, we apply knowledge, we improve, and we become more effective and more efficient. The real life situation is far different from our naive model. Rather than the smooth transition from concept to implementation, rejection is inevitable. If outright denial is not apparent, then subtle subversion is almost certain. Psychological and neurological research presents some insight into why people do not accept obvious Merchant Cash Advance Industry improvements. It shows why people work hard at keeping the merchant cash advance status quo.
Merchant Cash advance funding is typically available within a week of submitting the application. Our information transfer model starts with knowledge arising out of research, research develops into a useable technology, new merchant cash advance technology becomes part of the curriculum in universities and schools, graduates carry their new merchant cash advance technology into the workplace, then methods and processes face rejection in work life. What causes the difficult entry into the work situation? For example, why did statistical process control, developed by Dr. Walter Shewhart in May of 1924, have such a difficult time finding acceptance in modern American work? It has considerable rejection even in 2011! Most of us have the naïve notion we can learn new ideas, which are perfectly sound, then put those ideas into practice. All we need is to present the concepts, prove its value, and enjoy the fruits. The reality is a significant impediment exists between useful ideas and successful implementation. Normal human behavior will revolt against productive transformation. Individuals and groups relegate significant advances to the trash heap. Understanding the rejection behavior is the key to negotiating the Merchant Cash Advance implementation hurdles successfully. Understanding the behavior of people and groups is necessary to move Dr. Shewhart’s very simple ideas into broad practice.
Every person has a personal "theory of everything". We exist in a world where reality is only a perception. From our birth, we intake data then try to make sense of it with respect to previous merchant cash advance data we collected. The Scientist in the Crib by Alison Gopnik et al., documents how this process begins at birth. Eventually we individually fit all this data into a grand mosaic of the universe, our own personal "theory of everything".
Merchant Cash advance funding is typically available within a week of submitting the application. So long as we are alive, we are inside a meteor storm of new data. We have plenty of receptors to recognize new information. Upon discovering a new idea, we have only three options: We can accept the new data as accurate; we can examine the new data for relevance and applicability; or we can reject the new merchant cash advance information.
A merchant cash advance is a safe approach to accessing cash. If we accept new data as accurate on its face, then we are unable to form a concept of the universe around us. New data would just replace old data. Let us use the analogy of a large jigsaw puzzle. By blindly accepting new data, we would never find a starting point. The jigsaw pieces could never relate to each other. Even though all the pieces would be on the card table, we would never be able to distinguish the edge pieces for the interior pieces. We would not be able to group pieces by having a common relationship with an adjacent piece. We would not even be able to determine if we had seen this particular piece before.
The most prudent action is to consider the new merchant cash advance data in relationship to our existing data bank. Again, the puzzle analogy, we try to find a relationship to the already investigated portion of the picture. Is it the edge? Does it have a color relationship with the photographic theme? Does it have a shape relationship with other pieces? Perhaps we do not understand the real significance of its different merchant cash advance attributes. Perhaps we will assemble the whole puzzle only to determine this in an errant piece. Perhaps it came from a puzzle on an adjacent table. Perhaps it is a malformed aberration. Perhaps we need to reconsider our "theory of everything" and adjust the theory to account for new information.
Posted on: August 29, 2011 12:26 PM